|
RADIOSENSITIZING EFFECT OF BORON ENHANCES
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PROTON THERAPY IN VITRO
Dmitry Lebedev, Luiza Garaeva, Vladimir Burdakov, Andrey Volnitskiy, Natalya Razgildina, Alina Garina, Dmitry Amerkanov, Fedor Pack, Konstantin Shabalin, Evgeniy Ivanov, Victor Ezhov, Andrey Konevega, Tatiana Shtam
Pages: 60-65
DOI: 10.21175/RadProc.2020.12
Abstract |
References | Cite This | Full Text (PDF)
Proton therapy is used today to treat many cancers and is particularly appropriate in situations where surgery options are limited, and conventional radiotherapy presents unacceptable risks to patients. A few years ago, it was suggested
that an increase of up to a factor of two of the doses at the proton Bragg
peak could be achieved if boron is accumulated in the tumor tissues. The
mechanism responsible for a higher dose was suggested to be related to
proton-boron fusion reactions, leading to the production of high Linear
Energy Transfer (LET) α-particles. Nowadays there are single works showing
the effectiveness of proton beam irradiation boron-11-containing cancer
cells. A limited number of the studies devoted to the application of 11B(p,3a) nuclear
reaction in proton therapy and lack of consistency in their results do not
allow to judge about the prospects of the boron-containing drugs
utilization in proton therapy to increase its antitumor efficacy. In this
work, we experimentally test the possibility to enhance proton biological
effectiveness in boron-11-containing cancer cells in vitro. Human
glioblastoma cells were pre-incubated with boron compound (Na2B 4O7, sodium tetraborate)
and irradiated with increasing doses 2-8 Gy at the proton Bragg peak. To
test whether the physical nuclear reaction 11B(p,3a) results in an
enhancement of the cancer cell death by high-energy proton beam
irradiation, cell lines were also irradiated with graded doses 2-8 Gy using
γ-ray source. The ability of boron compound to activate the cancer cell
death with protons at the Bragg peak irradiation was shown in vitro. At the
same time, weaker similar effect was determined for gamma-irradiation that
may indicate not only the physical nature of influence boron at irradiated
cancer cell viability but a specific biological effect. The data suggest
that the combined effect of proton therapy with 11B on glioma
cells increases their sensitivity to proton irradiation with low toxicity
of the boron compound for cells of normal morphology.
-
R. Mohan, D. Grosshans, “Proton therapy – present and future,” Adv. Drug Delivery Rev., vol. 109,
pp. 26–44, Jan. 2017.
DOI:
10.1016/j.addr.2016.11.006
-
X. Tian, K. Liu, Y. Hou, J Cheng, J. Zhang, “The evolution of proton beam
therapy: Current and future status,” Mol. Clin. Oncol., vol. 8,
no. 1,
pp. 15-21, Jan. 2018.
DOI:
10.3892/mco.2017.1499
-
A. C. Begg, F. A. Stewart, C. Vens, “Strategies to improve radiotherapy
with targeted drugs,” Nat. Rev. Cancer, vol. 11, no. 4, pp.
239-253,
Apr. 2011.
DOI:
10.1038/nrc3007
PMid: 21430696
-
F. Tranquart, “Radiosensitizers and radiochemotherapy in the treatment of cancer,” Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 42, no. 2, Nov. 2015.
DOI:
10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.10.004
-
A. A. Lipengol’ts, A. A. Cherepanov, V. N. Kulakov, E. Yu. Grigor’eva, I.
B. Merkulova, I. N. Sheino, “Comparison of the antitumor efficacy of
bismuth and gadolinium as dose-enhancing agents in formulations for photon
capture therapy,” Pharm. Chem., vol. 51, pp. 783–786, Dec. 2017.
DOI:
10.1007/s11094-017-1693-1
-
I. N. Sheino, P. V. Izhevskij, A. A. Lipengolts,
V. N. Kulakov, A. A. Wagner, E. S. Sukhikh et al., “Development of binary
technologies of radiotherapy of malignant neoplasms: condition and
problems,” Bulletin of Siberian Medicine,
vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 192-209, 2017.
DOI:
10.20538/1682-0363-2017-3-192-209
-
S. Miyatake, M. Wanibuchi, N. Hu, K. Ono, “Boron neutron capture therapy
for malignant brain tumors,” J. Neurooncol., vol. 149, no. 1, pp.
1–11, Aug. 2020.
DOI:
10.1007/s11060-020-03586-6
-
D. Yoon, J. Jung, T. Suh, “Application of proton boron fusion reaction to
radiation therapy: A Monte Carlo simulation study,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 105, p. 223507, Dec. 2014.
DOI:
10.1063/1.4903345
-
J. Y. Jung, D. K. Yoon, B. Barraclough, H. C. Lee, T. S. Suh, B. Lu,
“Comparison between proton boron fusion therapy (PBFT) and boron neutron
capture therapy (BNCT): Monte Carlo study,” Oncotarget., vol. 8,
no. 24, pp. 39774-39781,
Feb. 2017.
DOI:
10.18632/oncotarget.15700
-
G. A. P. Cirrone, L. Manti, D. Margarone,
G. Petringa, L. Giuffrida, A. Minopoli et al., “First experimental proof of
proton boron capture therapy (PBCT) to enhance proton therapy
effectiveness,” Sci. Rep., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 1141,
Jan. 2018.
DOI:
10.1038/s41598-018-19258-5
-
A. Mazzone, P. Finocchiaro, S. Lo Meo, N. Colonna, “On the (un)
effectiveness of proton boron capture in proton therapy,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus, vol. 134,
p. 361, Jul. 2019.
DOI:
10.1140/epjp/i2019-12725-8
-
A. Volnitskiy, T. Shtam, V. Burdakov, R. Kovalev,
A. Konev, M. Filatov, “Abnormal activity of transcription factors gli in
high-grade gliomas,” PLoS One, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. e0211980, Feb.
2019.
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0211980
PMid: 30730955
PMCid:
PMC6366868
-
S.A. Artamonov, E.M. Ivanov, N.A. Ivanov,
J.S. Lebedeva, G. A. Riabov. “Numerical simulation and optimization of the
variable energy
60–1000 MeV proton beams at PNPI synchrocyclotron for testing the radiation
resistance of electronics,” Phys. Part. Nuclei Lett., vol. 14, pp.
188–200, Jan. 2017.
DOI:
10.1134/S1547477117010046
-
A. Yu. Bushmanov, I. N. Sheino, A. A. Lipengolts, A. N. Solovev, S. N.
Koryakin, “Prospects of proton therapy combined technologies in the
treatment of cancer,” Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety, vol.
64, no. 3, pp. 8-11, 2019.
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0211980
Dmitry Lebedev, Luiza Garaeva, Vladimir Burdakov, Andrey Volnitskiy, Natalya Razgildina, Alina Garina, Dmitry Amerkanov, Fedor Pack, Konstantin Shabalin, Evgeniy Ivanov, Victor Ezhov, Andrey Konevega, Tatiana Shtam,"Radiosensitizing effect of boron enhances the effectiveness of proton therapy in vitro," RAD Conf. Proc, vol. 4, 2020, pp. 60–65, http://doi.org/10.21175/RadProc.2020.12
|