Vol. 2, 2017

Original research papers

Radiation Protection

QUANTIFICATION OF THE RISK-REFLECTING STOCHASTIC AND DETERMINISTIC RADIATION EFFECTS

Jozef Sabol, Bedřich Šesták

Pages: 104-108

DOI: 10.21175/RadProc.2017.22

The purpose of radiation protection is to protect workers, patients and members of the general public against any excessive impact of exposure to ionizing radiation, and to control the radioactive contamination of the environment in accordance with the strict regulatory standards. In order to adopt any measures to regulate the exposure from various sources, it is necessary to introduce a reliable and consistent system of the quantification of radiation exposure due to external and internal sources. Only very low doses (comparable with the natural radiation background) are encountered under normal circumstances. Such exposures may result in stochastic (delayed) effects, where the probability of their occurrence is proportional to the magnitude of the effective dose expressed in Sv (sievert). While for the stochastic effects only the unit of Sv can be used, for the quantification of deterministic effects (tissue reaction), which occur at rather higher doses, other quantities and units are more appropriate. In this case, one relies on a new quantity, namely RBE-weighted dose with a unit of Eq-Gy (equivalent gray). The paper offers some original illustrations of the system of quantities for assessing both stochastic and deterministic harmful effects of ionizing radiation.
  1. J. Sabol, “Do we all understand the ambient dose equivalent in the same way?” Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry, vol. 142, no. 2-4, pp. 385-386, Sep. 2010.
    DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncq221
    PMid: 20823038
  2. J. Sabol, B. Šesták, “Education in radiation protection and radiation risk communication to the public,” in Proc. RAD Conference, Niš, Serbia, 2016,vol. 1, pp. 58-64.
    DOI: 10.21175/radproc.2016.15
  3. S. Mattsson, M. Söderberg, “Dose quantities and units for radiation protection,” in Radiation protection in nuclear medicine, S. Mattson and C. Hoeschen, Eds., Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2013, ch. 2, pp. 7-18.
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31167-3_2
  4. Historical evolution of radiation quantities and units, Quizlet.
    Retrieved from: https://quizlet.com/53852689/historical-evolution-of-radiation-quantities-and-units-flash-cards/
    Retrieved on: Jan. 24, 2017.
  5. W. A. Jennings, “Evolution over the past century of quantities and units in radiation dosimetry,” J. of Radiological Protection, vol. 27, pp. 5-16, Mar. 2007.
    DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/27/1/R01
    PMid: 17341801
  6. “Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation,” United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, New York (NY), USA, Rep. 46 (A/67/46), 2015.
    Retrieved from: http://www.unscear.org/docs/reports/2012/UNSCEAR2012Report_15-08936_eBook_website.pdf
    Retrieved on: Jan. 25, 2017
  7. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, 1st ed., ICRP, Ottawa, Canada, 2007.
    Retrieved from: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/235351/mod_resource/content/1/ICRP_103_todo.pdf
    Retrieved on: Jan. 25, 2017
  8. European Commission. (Oct. 16, 2015). 2015-IMP-MSG-15 EU general risk assessment methodology (Action 5 of Multi-Annual Action Plan for the surveillance of products in the EU (COM(2013)76)).
    Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/17107/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/pdf
    Retrieved on: Feb. 1, 2017
  9. “RBE weighted absorbed dose,”panel discussion at the Joint IES-ICRP Symposium, Aomori, Japan, Oct. 4, 2016.
    Retrieved from: http://www.icrp.org/docs/2016aomori/7%20Real.pdf
    Retrieved on: Jan. 25, 2017