Numerous sources emitting high levels of optical radiation are used for cosmetic purposes, but data available on human health protection differ significantly amongst different countries. The great variety of cosmetics’ sources and their application by different population groups are the causes that make this problem an important public health and social issue. The literature review performed by the International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) shows that legislation of different countries and organizations covers devices considered as medical. There is no such legislation for most of the cosmetic devices. For many optical sources, only technological standards exist that regulate the product’s performance. For others, the requirements are set in nonmandatory standards. A serious problem with the human health protection on use of such devices is that their application is a personal choice of the user - the exposure is voluntary. Our country has no policy for this type of optical radiation application except for the workers. A Directive for the protection of workers with similar sources is implemented in EU countries and transposed in Bulgaria, but its application is limited for use in cosmetics. Generally, the legislation covers applications of optical radiation defined as medical treatment only. There are no data on the number and qualifications of staff providing treatment in cosmetics. A policy for safety and health protection in this field is commonly missing for general public protection. Here, in this paper, the problem is addressed to the common sources used for cosmetics purposes (solaria, IPL systems). This article focuses on the common sources used for cosmetic purposes (tanning beds, IPL systems). The specific risks associated with the application of the sources are discussed. Based on the analysis of the problem, а development of specific legislation, corresponding to the specific health risks is proposed. The single data we have from measurements performed in cosmetic studios with sunbeds show increased risk for the personnel and users as well. The aim of the study is to propose development of a policy for health protection on using optical radiation sources for therapeutic and cosmetic applications on the basis of scientific literature and on our own experience.

1. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), “Intended Human Exposure to Non-ionizing Radiation for Cosmetic Purposes,” Health Physics, vol. 118, no. 5, pp. 562–579, 2020
   DOI: 10.1097/HP.0000000000001169
2. Photobiological safety of lamps and lamp systems, Standard no. EN 62471:2008, Mar. 1, 2009.
3. Professional indoor sun exposure services – Part 1: Requirements for the provision of training , Standard no. EN 16489-1:2014, Jul. 31, 2014.
4. Professional indoor UV exposure services – Part 2: Required qualification and competence of the indoor UV exposure consultant , Standard no. EN 16489-2:2014, Mar. 31, 2015.
5. Professional indoor UV exposure services – Part 3: Requirements for the provision of services , Standard no. EN 16489-3, Mar. 31, 2015.
6. Household and similar electrical appliances - Safety - Part 2-27: Particular requirements for appliances for skin exposure to ultraviolet and infrared radiation , Standard no. EN 60335-2-27:2013, Mar. 13, 2014.
7. Министерство на труда и социалната политика/Министерство на здравеопазването. (Юни 29, 2010). Наредба №5 от 11 юни 2010 г. за минималните изисквания за осигуряване на здравето и безопасността на работещите при рискове, свързани с експозиция на изкуствени оптични лъчения
   (Ministry of Labor and Social Policy/Ministry of Health. (Jun. 29, 2010). Ordinance no. 5 of 11 June 2010 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to risks arising from exposure to artificial optical radiation. )
   Retrieved from: https://www.mh.government.bg/media/filer_public/2015/04/20/naredba5-ot-11-06-2010g-bezopastnost-raboteshti-pri-riskove.doc
   Retrieved on: Nov. 1, 2022
8. The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. (Apr. 5, 2006). Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to risks arising from physical agents (artificial optical radiation) (19th individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) .
   Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:114:0038:0059:en:PDF
   Retrieved on: Oct. 15, 2022
9. Lasers and Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) sources used for cosmetic purposes , ARPANSA, Melbourne, Australia, 2019.
   Retrieved from: https://www.arpansa.gov.au/understanding-radiation/radiation-sources/more-radiation-sources/intense-pulsed-light-sources-used-for-cosmetic-purposes
   Retrieved on: Nov. 1, 2022
10. Use of strong light sources in cosmetics associated with risks, Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), Salzgitter, Germany, 2018.
    Retrieved from: https://www.bfs.de/SharedDocs/Pressemitteilungen/BfS/EN/2018/007.html
    Retrieved on: Oct. 15, 2022
11. Artificial tanning devices: public health interventions to manage sunbeds , World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland, 2017.
    Retrieved from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241512596
    Retrieved on: Nov. 1, 2022
12. The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), “Health issues of ultraviolet tanning appliances used for cosmetic purposes,” Health Physics, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 119–127, Jan. 2003.
    DOI: 10.1097/00004032-200301000-00015
13. Opinion on biological effects of ultraviolet radiation relevant to health with particular reference to sunbeds for cosmetic purposes , SCHEER, Luxembourg, 2017.
    Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/scheer/docs/scheer_o_003.pdf
    Retrieved on: Oct. 15, 2022
14. “Solar and ultraviolet radiation,” in IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans Vol. 100 D – Radiation: A review of human carcinogens , 1^st edition, Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2012, pp. 35–102.
    Retrieved from: https://publications.iarc.fr/121
    Retrieved on: Nov. 1, 2022
15. Exposure to artificial UV radiation and skin cancer, IARC Working Group Report Vol. 1, IARC, Lyon, France, 2006.
    Retrieved from: https://www.iarc.who.int/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/ArtificialUVRadSkinCancer.pdf
    Retrieved on: Nov. 1, 2022
16. M. Ivanova, M. Israel, “Legislation on human health protection on using solaria,” Bulgarian Journal of Public Health, Supplement, vol. 7, no. 2(1), pp. 270-275, 2015.
    Retrieved from: https://ncpha.government.bg/uploads/pages/3023/BGJPH_2015_02_S.pdf
    Retrieved on: Nov. 1, 2022

M. Ivanova, M. Israel, Ts. Shalamanova, Hr. Petkova, V. Zaryabova, M. Stoynovska, "General public and workers protection on using optical radiation sources for cosmetic purposes", RAD Conf. Proc, vol. 6, 2022, pp. 98-102, http://doi.org/10.21175/RadProc.2022.18