Volume 5, 2021

Radiobiology

COMBINED EXPOSURE TO HALOTHANE AND 1 OR 2 Gy IONIZING RADIATION CAUSES A SYNERGISTIC EFFECT IN DNA DAMAGE IN THE BLOOD AND LIVER OF SWISS ALBINO MICE

Vesna Benković, Nikola Borojević, Nada Oršolić, Gordana Brozović, Anica Horvat Knežević, Mirta Milić

Pages: 53–56

DOI: 10.21175/RadProc.2021.10

Patient immobilization by general volatile anesthesia (VA) during medical radiology treatment is sometimes necessary and annual trends are increasing. Ionizing radiation (IR) exposure is known to cause some level of DNA damage since IR is a well-known genotoxic and cytotoxic agent, although the doses used are kept to a minimum, with good localization in order to protect as much healthy tissue and organs as possible from exposure. Recently, a growing number of studies have demonstrated that volatile anesthetics can also cause DNA damage effects in patients, and in occupationally exposed personnel. Since there are no studies on the combined effects of IR and VA, we decided to use an animal model of Swiss albino mice to determine whether there are elevated levels of DNA damage after combined exposure by mimicking real conditions of exposure during radiology treatment. Healthy male mice (5 animals per group) were anaesthetized by inhaling 2.4% halothane for 2 hours and then were exposed to either 1 or 2 Gy of ionizing radiation (60Co source). Groups were examined immediately after exposure, and again after 2, 6 and 24 hours. Blood was taken from the tail, and liver after animal sacrifice. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Croatia, and designed in accordance with the relevant Croatian guidelines (Animal Protection Act, Ordinance on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes). Duplicate samples were prepared for the alkaline comet assay, and DNA damage of a total of 200 comets per point was assessed with Comet Assay IV software. The results demonstrated that both halothane and IR caused elevated DNA damage levels, and when applied in combined treatment caused synergistic effect additional damaging effect that was not repaired even 24 hours after exposure. These data confirm concerns about the safety of combined VA and IR exposure, and indicate the need for further investigation on the safety and proper use of the type of anesthetic needed during radiotherapy.
  1. Radiation: Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans Volume 100D , Lyon, France: IARC, 2012.
    Retrieved from: https://publications.iarc.fr/Book-And-Report-Series/Iarc-Monographs-On-The-Identification-Of-Carcinogenic-Hazards-To-Humans/Radiation-2012
    Retrieved on: May 1, 2021
  2. J. M. Borras et al., “Estimating the number of fractions by tumour site for European countries in 2012 and 2025: An ESTRO-HERO analysis,” Radiother. Oncol., vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 198-204, 2018.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2017.11.009
  3. C. Fiorino, M. Guckenberger, M. Schwarz, U. H. Heide, B. Heijmen, “Technology‐driven research for radiotherapy innovation,” Mol. Oncol., vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 1500-1513, Mar. 2020.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.12659
  4. J. S. Vaidya et al., “Long term survival and local control outcomes from single dose targeted intraoperative radiotherapy during lumpectomy (TARGIT-IORT) for early breast cancer: TARGIT-A randomised clinical trial”, B.M.J., vol. 370, article no. m2836, Aug. 2020.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m2836
  5. Radiotherapy dose fractionation, 3rd ed., London, UK: The Royal College of Radiologist, 2019.
    Retrieved from: http://www.rcr.ac.uk/publication/radiotherapy-dose-fractionation-third-edition
    Retrieved on: May 27, 2021
  6. R. Arunkumar, E. Rebello, P. Owusu-Agyemang, “Anesthetic techniques for unique cancer surgery procedures,” Best Pract. Res. Clin. Anaesthesiol., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 513-526, Dec. 2013.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2013.09.002
  7. S. M. Ntouka et al., “Minimizing General Anesthetic Use in Pediatric Radiation Therapy”, Pract. Radiat. Oncol., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. e159-e165, May 2020.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2019.12.001
  8. M. J. Gyorfi, P. Y. Kim, “Halothane Toxicity”, in StatPearls [Internet], Treasure Island (FL), USA: StatPearls Publishing, 2021
    Retrieved from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK545281/
    Retrieved on: Aug. 27, 2021
  9. J. A. Campagna, K. W. Miller, S. A. Forman, “Mechanisms of actions of inhaled anesthetics,” N. Engl. J. Med., vol. 348, no. 21, pp. 2110-2124, May 2003.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra021261
  10. S. Chiao, Z. Zuo, “A double-edged sword: volatile anesthetic effects on the neonatal brain,” Brain Sci., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 273-294, Apr. 2014.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci4020273
  11. D. Schifilliti, G. Grasso, A. Conti, V. Fodale, “Anesthetic-Related Neuroprotection,” CNS Drugs, vol. 24, pp. 893–907, 2010.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11584760-000000000-00000
  12. S. Yılmaz, N. Ç. Çalbayram, “Exposure to anesthetic gases among operating room personnel and risk of genotoxicity: A systematic review of the human biomonitoring studies,” J. Clin. Anesth., vol. 35, pp. 326-331, Dec. 2016.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.08.029
  13. G. Brozovic et al., “DNA damage and repair after exposure to sevoflurane in vivo, evaluated in Swiss albino mice by the alkaline comet assay and micronucleus test,” J. Appl. Genet., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 79-86, 2010.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03195714
  14. G. Brozović et al., “Sevoflurane and isoflurane genotoxicity in kidney cells of mice,” Arh. Hig. Rada Toksikol., vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 228-35, Sep. 2017.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/aiht-2017-68-2941
  15. Hrvatski Sabor (4. list. 2017), Zakon o zaštiti životinja, NN 102/17. (Croatian Parliament (Oct. 4, 2017), Animal Protection Act, O.G. 102/17.)
    Retrieved from: https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2017_10_102_2342.html
    Retrieved on: May 21, 2021.
  16. Hrvatski Sabor (8. svi. 2013.), Pravilnik o zaštiti životinja koje se koriste u znanstvene svrhe, NN 55/13. (Croatian Parliament, Ordinance on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes, O.G. 55/13.)
    Retrieved from: https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2013_05_55_1129.html
    Retrieved on: May 21, 2021
  17. The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union (Sep. 22, 2010), Directive 2010/63/EU.
    Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2010:276:0033:0079:en:PDF
    Retrieved on: May 21, 2021
  18. D. J. Gaertner, T. M. Hallman, F. C. Hankenson, M. A. Batchelder., “Anesthesia and Analgesia in Rodents” in Anesthesia and Analgesia in Laboratory Animals, R.E. Fish, M.J. Brown, P.J. Danneman, A.Z. Karas, Eds., 2nd ed., London, UK: Academic Press, Elsevier, 2008, ch. 10, pp. 240-261.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012373898-1.50014-0
  19. B. A. Siddiqui, P. Y. Kim, “Anesthesia Stages”, in: StatPearls [Internet], Treasure Island (FL), USA: StatPearls Publishing, Jan. 2021.
    Retrieved from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557596/
  20. N. P. Singh, M. T. McCoy, R. R. Tice, L. L. Schneider, “A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells,” Exp. Cell Res., vol. 175, no. 1, pp. 184-191, Mar. 1988.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(88)90265-0
  21. G. G. Nair C. K. Nair, “Protection of cellular DNA and membrane from γ-radiation-induced damages and enhancement in DNA repair by sesamol,” Cancer Biother. Radiopharm., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 629-635, Dec. 2010.
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cbr.2010.0803
Vesna Benković, Nikola Borojević, Nada Oršolić, Gordana Brozović, Anica Horvat Knežević, Mirta Milić, "Combined exposure to halothane and 1 or 2 gy ionizing radiation causes a synergistic effect in dna damage in the blood and liver of swiss albino mice", RAD Conf. Proc, vol. 5, 2021, pp. 53–56, http://doi.org/10.21175/RadProc.2021.10